Myth Busters2018-03-13T06:30:20+00:00


With constant change, comes a lack of clarity and potential misunderstanding… the real truth might just surprise you.

Yes you can… and I can service my own car, but I know I’ll make mistakes with it.

Historically (before all the changes) product providers were willing to give out enormous help and guidance (as distinct from advice) to people wanting to transfer. However the world changed in April 2015 (and subsequently again in May 2016 and April 2017)  adding a huge layer of complexity. Today, the same product providers once so eager to help will not afford any assistance out of fear of getting it wrong.

The need for advice and ensuring things are done at the right time and in the right order is crucial.

It may not be rocket science (depending on the complexity of the transfer and the individual’s circumstances) however get the process wrong and you can create restrictions for yourself or trigger unwanted tax consequences in both the UK or Australia.

On a weekly basis we get a phone call from someone that has come ‘unstuck’ trying to DIY. Sometimes we can help, sometimes it’s too late…

A lot of people think they can’t transfer once they turn 65 but this is not necessarily true. It is true that some schemes will not allow a transfer if you are within 12 months of your selected retirement date (in the UK this is often 65 years of age). So one of the first thing we need to understand is if the trustees of your UK scheme will allow the transfer.

Secondly, considering that part of your transfer is considered to be a non-concessional (after tax) contribution there are restrictions as to how much you can contribute once you are over the age of 65 – currently $100,000 p.a.

In basic terms this amount is calculated as the value of your pension on the date you arrived in Australia. i.e. If you have a value of more than AUS $100,000 at the date you arrived in Australia it will either have to be transferred over a period of time or other strategies considered to get it here in one lump sum (requires tailored advice).

The third issue is, if you are over 65 then you have to meet a ‘work test’ in order to make a superannuation contribution in Australia.

To meet the work test you must be able to prove you have been ‘gainfully employed’ for at least 40 hours in a 30 day period at some stage during the financial year.

It is a time consuming process, we have to navigate legislation in both hemispheres and UK pension schemes are exposed if they make mistakes. As with any institution when there is that fear of loss they need to protect their shareholders and other investors, but we are working very closely with the UK schemes and various industry bodies to try and improve the process.

Like building a house, we all want it finished today, but its going to take a few months.

This is certainly true and it might be the case for many but a transfer is not a transaction it requires advice and through the advice process the correct way forward will be uncovered.  Large transfers do bring complexity and the considerations are many; historical values, contribution strategy and UK lifetime allowance limits to name a few.

In some cases we find that deliberately breaking the non-concessional cap is advantageous, yet in others this same strategy could trigger UK tax implications – There is no hard and fast rule, the solution is different for each individual and the key is tailored advice.

Simply not true. UK pension schemes are designed and built to provide pension incomes to members on retirement. Death benefits are ancillary to this function only.
E.g. David leaves his money in the UK, he passes away and his UK Employer Ltd pension scheme pays £20,000 per year, only half of which would continue to his wife upon death. The corresponding transfer value had he transferred his money to Australia may be close to a million dollars. The difference this makes to your estate is unquantifiable. Further if David and his wife were both to die together today there are no benefits paid out to their children if they are adults.
This is the fundamental difference between the two regimes. The Australian system recognises that it is David’s money (albeit in superannuation) as opposed to the UK where David is recognised as no more than a liability on the balance sheet.

A natural misconception but not necessarily the case. Defined Benefit/Final Salary transfers are driven largely by bond markets (or in simple terms interest rates) and where interest rates increase (as most would expect to happen across the western world as they recover their economies) transfer values are likely to fall.

Whats more there is currently a consultation by the UK Department for work and pensions (DWP) on how to maintain these Defined Benefit/Final Salary schemes as they are grossly underfunded.

This is the case if you have a Defined Benefit/Final Salary scheme exceeding £30,000 and for certain personal funds with guaranteed annuity rates. Part of our pension transfer service is to identify if this advice is required and if so, provide this solution via our aligned UK advisors at a very competitive rate.

You may be surprised by the actual value of your pension.

There are two main types of UK pensions:

  • Defined benefit/final salary
  • Accumulation funds  (personal or money purchase)

If you have an accumulation fund then you may well be right, the value is set and clear so that number needs to be large enough to justify the cost of the transfer.

However with defined benefit schemes you don’t have a value, instead what you have is a pension at date of leaving that needs to be protected, re-valued and preserved in-line with UK legislation. The corresponding actuarial value behind this is far higher than 99% of clients think.
Why? The easiest way to understand it is interest rates. When interest rates are low (as they are currently worldwide), then the actuary is going to have to put a lot more cash aside to get the yield to meet your pension obligation.

Simplistically when interest rates double, transfer value halves.

We hear this misconception all the time and it has been further amplified with fluctuations following Brexit.

Our belief is, if it makes sense to transfer then you do it straight away.

Too many people have held off ‘waiting for better days’ only to be faced with changes that either forced their hand (at an even higher exchange rates) or in some cases rendered them ineligible to transfer at all.

At FinSec PTX we have a solution in place to transfer the money in sterling into a sterling bank account within the superannuation fund. You can then control exactly when you are going to convert all or some of that money progressively into Australian dollars.

When the UK changes came into effect April 2015 it became difficult for many people to navigate the transfer landscape and many offshore providers saw it as an opportunity to promote themselves, looking to get a ‘piece of the funds under management pie’.

HMRC became extremely concerned with people transferring to a country where they did not have residency i.e. tax evasion and people trying to find a loophole to get their money to Australia) and therefore brought in new rules on the 9 March 2017. Effectively these new rules state that QROPS transfers offshore will incur a tax charge of 25% on the total transfer value if the individual does not reside in the same country as the QROPS.

On the face of things this would appear to be the case but once again it is about advice. With a clear understanding of UK and Australian legislation and how they interact with one another it is quite possible to overcome this.

We can and have created situations where clients have not had to pay tax on withdrawals within the QROPS control period, but only if the right process, in the right order is followed.

This is not a myth, there are very few.

Generally speaking in the pension transfers space there are only a handful of key players, add to this SMSF speciality and the number halves again.

At FinSec we have specialised in both pension transfers and SMSF independently of each other for over 20 years.

Put simply this is not the case. HMRC in April 2015 and April 2017 made restrictions to better align the protections they provide to UK funded schemes. Today there are many more restrictions than before but for those with a Defined Benefit/Final Salary or Personal Pension it is still possible to transfer your UK pension to Australia.
Yes, if you want to trigger hefty UK taxes!
UK rules introduced in April 2017 dictate that money transferred after April 2017 must remain in the QROPS environment for the greater of A) the balance of the UK tax year plus 10 years since you were last a UK resident or B) the balance of the UK tax year plus 5 years since the date the transfer was received by the Australian fund. If you were to rollover to another fund within these periods you will pay up to 55% in UK tax.
This is another misconception we hear week in week out. Yes, it is true that some people might be better off leaving their pension in the UK however in our experience the majority will benefit from having their money in Australia. Generally speaking you will pay less tax in retirement, have greater control and flexibility over the funds and from a death benefits point of view unlike the UK 100% is payable tax-free to your spouse or dependants.
Not everybody should transfer their money to Australia, but everybody should understand whether to or not.